Received: by mail2.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom) id SAA01297; Thu, 8 Sep 1994 18:40:18 -0700
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com by mail2.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom) id SAA01288; Thu, 8 Sep 1994 18:40:15 -0700
From: Kermit@cup.portal.com
Received: from hobo.corp.portal.com (hobo.online.portal.com [156.151.5.5]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.7/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA23849 for <lightwave-l@netcom.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 1994 18:39:39 -0700
Received: from localhost (pccop@localhost) by hobo.corp.portal.com (8.6.4/1.63) id SAA26033 for lightwave-l@netcom.com; Thu, 8 Sep 1994 18:39:37 -0700
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: Re: WaveMaker vs Lightwave
Lines: 14
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 18:39:37 PDT
Message-ID: <9409081839.3.24029@cup.portal.com>
X-Origin: The Portal System (TM)
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
> No problem, use 3.1 or 3.0 right.... Yes BUT... I need to render these
> same animations to Scala MM300, which makes 3.5 a bit more attractive
> because of the easy HAM anim rendering. I dont' have AnimWorkShop to help
> me out, plus these animations are easily gonna be 400 frames plus; ie: lack
> of hard drive space for 400+ RGB raw images not to mention the hassle.
Grab the shareware package REND24 by Tom Krehbiel, the author of ImageFX,
for this. It will wait for frames, render them, add them to an anim,
then wait for the next frame. This same sort of utility is present in